Same workflow.
Different meters.
Before comparing prices, estimate what your workflow consumes. Explore a simple, non-AI flow with one trigger and a few actions per record.
Count the work.
Two units. Not two prices.
A smaller unit count does not mean a lower bill. Check plan allowances, features and billing periods before buying.
Batch size is a design choice
In this model, each run starts with a trigger that emits records directly. Every record then passes through the same actions. Larger batches reduce the number of starts; they do not remove per-record work. Batching can increase delay and memory use.
Keep the estimate honest
This is a planning model, not a measured benchmark. It excludes extra fetch/iterator modules, branching, retries, sub-workflows, AI charges and third-party API fees. Add those separately using a real execution log.
What about free alternatives?
Make has a free tier with limits. n8n Community Edition is available to self-host; hosting, updates and recovery still take resources. An existing script may be sufficient for a simple task. This calculator does not establish feature compatibility or recommend migrating.
Sources and calculation method
Official documentation checked 20 September 2026. Make generally charges credits by module usage; standard action modules commonly consume a credit for each processed record. n8n describes an execution as a complete workflow run.
- Make: credits and variable usage
- Make: operations, triggers and bundles
- n8n: execution definition and plan information
Runs with data = ceiling(records ÷ records per run). Make estimate = data runs + empty runs + records × actions. n8n estimate = data runs + empty runs. These formulas apply only to the workflow shape described above.